Yuku free message boards

xJuicyFlawless1889x wrote:

---

rsine69 wrote:

---

xJuicyFlawless1889x wrote:

---

Lucy's been a mom for quite a while now, I'm sure she can tell if her children are in danger or not, and I'm sure she would never give too much information away about her children

Never underestimate the resourcefulness of a lot of these celeb stalking nut jobs. As people have been pointing out, Lucy's been in the business for a long time so she should know better. She still can't be that naive. The thing I don't understand about fandom is the need for fans to know every aspect of a celeb's private life. I mean do they (the fans) really need to see photos of the the actor's children? Is it really that important?

Of course not. It's not important at all. I admire Lucy for the work she does, both with her charity and her career. Seeing her children is unimportant to me. I don't understand why you are making such a big deal about this though. I know you have your opinion on the matter, and you are totally allowed to think whatever you like about it, but criticizing Lucy and calling her naive because she let her son talk about his gingerbread house is going a bit far don't you think?

We all know that there are lunatics and nutjobs out there, but this camera guy did not pose any threat to Lucy or her son, and he left them alone afterwards. You're making it seem like this guy stalked them right out of the airport and back to their home.

As for fans needing to know EVERYTHING about a celebs life, I think that is totally untrue. I don't need to know every single detail about Lucy's personal life, nor do I care to, and I'm sure there are other people that feel the same way about it. The fact that Lucy is, in fact, a celebrity must be taken into account as well, she lives in a fishbowl and she knows it, it doesn't make her any less human. I'm sure a lot of Lucy's fans respect her right to privacy.

I don't know. To me, it seems like you are making a mountain out of an anthill.